Flappy Bird Creator Distances Himself from New Game
The Return of Flappy Bird
Flappy Bird, one of the most notorious mobile games in history, appeared to make a comeback on September 12, 2024. A tweet seemingly from the game’s original creator, Dong Nguyen, announced the return of the game. However, it quickly became evident that this new version was not associated with Nguyen. On September 15, Nguyen clarified via Twitter that he had no connection to the new game and had not sold any rights to his intellectual property.
Crypto Controversy Surrounding the New Game
Nguyen’s statement also addressed the incorporation of cryptocurrency in the new Flappy Bird game. He explicitly denounced crypto and stated that he had no involvement in the development or release of the new game. This revelation has led many to speculate that the new Flappy Bird might be a crypto scam, possibly a “rug-pull” scheme designed to deceive users and take their money.
Trademark Issues and Legal Battles
Adding to the controversy, it appears that the new Flappy Bird game does not own the copyright or trademark to the Flappy Bird name. Nguyen, due to inactivity, lost the trademark to Gametech Holdings Inc. in a swift court proceeding. This legal twist has further fueled suspicions that the new game might be illegitimate and that its creators could be exploiting the Flappy Bird name for financial gain.
The Original Flappy Bird’s Legacy
The original Flappy Bird was removed from Google Play and the App Store in 2014. Nguyen cited the overwhelming attention and fame as the reasons for its removal, stating that the game’s popularity had negatively impacted his life. Despite its short-lived availability, Flappy Bird left a lasting legacy in the gaming world, becoming a cultural phenomenon and a symbol of viral success.
The Cryptocurrency Market and Gaming
The timing of the new game’s release raises questions about the current state of the cryptocurrency market and its intersection with gaming. The rise of NFTs and crypto has created an environment ripe for exploitation, and the new Flappy Bird game seems to be capitalizing on this trend. With the original game’s infamy and the current notoriety of the cryptocurrency market, the new Flappy Bird’s dubious nature has captured significant attention.
Conclusion
As the gaming community awaits more information, the new Flappy Bird game raises important questions about intellectual property, cryptocurrency, and the ethics of game development. Dong Nguyen’s firm disassociation from the new game and his denouncement of crypto highlight the need for caution and due diligence in the ever-evolving landscape of gaming and digital assets.
